Masses and voids are the fundamental physical properties that form both the architectural and urban spaces. This study discusses the contributions made by the void in the architectural form to urban voids. Void is a concept which finds itself a place among the definitions of space. Where there is no void, there is no space as the space generates the void. However, other than making up a space as its main function, void can also exist within a space for symbolic, semantic, etc. reasons. The first title of section definitions and concepts of the study describes the relationship between the space and void. Areas remaining after architectural spaces in an urban space however are defined as void lots. The second title of section definitions and concepts of the study focuses on the definitions of an urban void while the relationship between an urban space and void is discussed. The discussions section questions the mutual impact between the void in architectural and urban spaces. The interaction between the voids in architectural and urban spaces is discussed and described with examples from the history and today. While the importance of the voids created in an architectural space in the shaping of urban voids is given emphasis, it is also asserted that rather than creating a space, the void might be capable of defining, directing and strengthening the relation between areas. It is also stated that this coexistence should be considered in architectural and urban spaces intended for design. The historical examples have been selected among the squares as the most important urban void lots while those of today have been selected among those existing with their impact in an architectural space and contributing to the urban area. In consequence, it could be said that the squares existing in the history as urban voids have been recreated through the voids in today's architectural spaces and that architectural voids are supporting
Mimari mekanı ve kentsel mekanı oluşturan temel fiziksel öğeler doluluklar ve boşluklardır. Bu çalışmada, mimari formdaki boşluğun kentsel mekan boşluklarına yaptığı katkılar tartışılmaktadır. Boşluk, mekan tanımları içinde kendine yer bulan bir kavramdır. Boşluk olmazsa mekan olmaz, mekanı var eden boşluktur. Ancak boşluk, asıl görevi olan mekan oluşturmanın dışında simgesel, anlamsal v.b gerekçelerle de mekan içinde var olabilir.
Çalışmanın tanımlar ve kavramlar kısmının ilk başlığında mekan ve boşluk ilişkisinden söz edilmektedir. Tanımlar ve kavramlar kısmının ikinci başlığında ise kentsel anlamdaki boşluğun tanımları üzerinde durulmakta, kentsel mekan ve boşluk ilişkisinden söz edilmektedir. Çalışma mekansal ve kentsel boşluğun ilişkisi üzerine tartışmalarla sonlandırılmaktadır.
